Oredigger

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Home >> Features >> Web Exclusive: Sex gets green with FOCUS
Check out the new CSM classifieds.  http://oredigger.net/csm-classifieds.html
-The Oredigger Newspaper

Web Exclusive: Sex gets green with FOCUS

E-mail Print
Jennifer Senour began her talk on Green Sex by telling a story about when she was in college at CU Boulder. After the September 11 attacks, she  decided to put an American flag up in the window in her dorm room, but her RA declared it a fire hazard. After asking a series of questions Senour discovered that the real reason why she had to remove the flag was that someone might find it offensive. At that moment, she realized how contradictory it was that the school should make condoms available in the women’s restroom (offensive to her and others) while they condemned the display of an American flag fearing that someone might be offended.  The speeches were sponsored by the Fellowship of Catholic University Students (FOCUS).

Senour then transitioned into her talk on Green Sex by advocating that not using contraceptives is “the greenest way, the natural way to have sex.” Senour explained, “there are huge consequences of contraceptive uses on our environment.”

In Boulder, a study found abnormalities with fish populations. Senour elaborated that an EPA study on the matter discovered that “the main culprits are estrogens and other chemicals from birth control pills.”

She explained that there are 62 million women of reproductive age, 13 million use contraceptives, and “of those, 3.1 million are teenagers.” She also noted, “the typical woman in US culture only wants 2 children.” Senour analyzed that for a sexually active woman to obtain that goal, she would use contraceptives for three decades.

Senour said that there were three main misconceptions about contraceptives primarily spread by industrial interests. First, contraception is “convenient.” Second, “Contraception is responsible.” And third, “It makes us free.”

Senour then began to read the small print on a package for contraceptive pills. She read out loud, “[They] may increase your risk of being diagnosed with breast cancer.”

“Is there something greener?” asked Senour, referring to natural family planning. She explained that there are only really two days per month when it is very common to get pregnant. It’s natural to ovulate, she summarized.

Up next was Sean Dalton who joked that he had been practicing Green Sex for 16 years and had 17 children.

When Dalton and his wife first met, she had to take birth control pills for medicinal reasons. She also wasn’t sure about having children. Dalton explained, “My wife had a lot of fear… even in high school she didn’t even think she wanted to have children.”

However, she had her first pregnancy 7 months into the marriage. Problems were detected and after further tests, the doctor recommended an abortion as there was a high probability of chromosome disorder and the child would probably live a troubled and short life. The Daltons declined. Further in, the baby started causing strain on Dalton’s wife, and the doctor suggested inducing labor early but the doctor explained that the baby might die under those circumstances. The Dalton’s declined. Later that night, Dalton’s wife went into labor naturally. The baby lived for 1 hour. Afterwards, the doctor said “I want you to know, that I didn’t agree with your decision but I do now.”

After the pregnancy, Dalton’s wife no longer required birth control; the problem went away during the pregnancy. They have had five children since and they have been happy with that number.

Dalton explained that with natural family planning, “the divorce rate is less than 2%,” the Mayo Clinic connected birth control pills with breast cancer, and natural family planning was “the best thing for marriage, the family, and the culture.”

Comments

avatar Al Gore
0
 
 
What a bunch of propaganda! The best way to protect the environment is to not reproduce. Humans are the cause of many ecological disasters as they seek more resources. More people = more resources pillaged. If you don't want to use condoms or the pill, get sterilized. But environmentalis m is not what this article is about, it's about promoting large families and spreading religious hegemony. Oh, and if Jennifer really wanted to hang an American flag in her window, she should have appealed to the CU chancellor or president, jobs with political accountability, and she would have found out that it was A-OK.
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Email (For verification & Replies)
Code   
ChronoComments by Joomla Professional Solutions
Submit Comment
Cancel
avatar Jeff Moore
0
 
 
I completely agree with you, Gore. A bunch of nonsense is what this article gives. Go green in other ways, because contraceptives are certainly not the main source of threats to our environment. We have bigger things to worry about.
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Email (For verification & Replies)
Code   
ChronoComments by Joomla Professional Solutions
Submit Comment
Cancel
avatar Marie
0
 
 
I agree. Utter nonsense. The "natural family planning" method seems wonderful if what I want is to accidently get pregnant, drop out of Mines, become a stay at home mom, and shove 15 more children out of my now ruined body. Awesome.
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Email (For verification & Replies)
Code   
ChronoComments by Joomla Professional Solutions
Submit Comment
Cancel
avatar Miner Alum
0
 
 
As an alum and an employee of Mines, I was shocked to see this article and searched desperately for some indication that I was unknowing reading a satire piece. I find it downright irresponsible to advocate NFP for student use. Sure, it's a plausible option for a married couple who are prepared for the consequences of failure. But for those sexually active students not in that position? I'm willing to wager that they're not prepared for the consequences, nor, as noted by Marie, are they interested in them. Furthermore, as mentioned by a colleague, what about protection against STDs? Is this no longer a concern? NFP certainly doesn't address this issue. "Utter nonsense" is well-said!
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Email (For verification & Replies)
Code   
ChronoComments by Joomla Professional Solutions
Submit Comment
Cancel
avatar Frustrated
0
 
 
The whole point of the talk was about being green. There is SO MUCH MORE that addresses what you have all brought up. And it all revolves around love. It's sick to me how perverted our world's idea of love actually is. Very few people have a sense of their dignity as humans anymore. Satan has done a FANTASTIC job of twisting sex into something contorted and messed up--it is now the norm for people to sleep around, use contraceptives (in every possible form), abort, etc. And our world just keeps going along with it.

And if you aren't prepared to handle the consequences of having sex, then the simple, practical, easy, logical solution is don't do it!
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Email (For verification & Replies)
Code   
ChronoComments by Joomla Professional Solutions
Submit Comment
Cancel
avatar Baumer
0
 
 
The best protection against STD's is abstinence. It's 100% effective ;)
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Email (For verification & Replies)
Code   
ChronoComments by Joomla Professional Solutions
Submit Comment
Cancel
avatar Baumer
0
 
 
Actually, your body will be far worse off if you allow yourself to use contraceptives. The health problems resulting from contraceptives have been proven to cause increased breast cancer, infertility, and other similar problems. If you believe that having children will "ruin" your body, you have clearly been blinded by the popular culture that we live in. Just an FYI, if it weren't for pregnancy and children, you wouldn't be here and neither would anyone else. Somethin you may find interesting about pregnancy and birth is that it is actually what is SUPPOSED to happen when you have sex. If you're not ready for that, try abstinence. It works wonders ;)
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Email (For verification & Replies)
Code   
ChronoComments by Joomla Professional Solutions
Submit Comment
Cancel
avatar Irritated Miner
0
 
 
You know, religion works when you try to argue from moral points. Not fact. Because when you try to use facts in this case, you lose. Contraceptives do not do any of the things that you mention.

And frankly lesbianism prevents pregnancy with just as much efficiency as abstinence. And it's just about as useful for a straight woman as the other option you mention. Why don't you start promoting that?
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Email (For verification & Replies)
Code   
ChronoComments by Joomla Professional Solutions
Submit Comment
Cancel
avatar Baumer
0
 
 
If humans are the biggest cause of ecological disruption, should humans kill themselves off to preserve the earth for the animals, who will not ruin it? The issue is not in having fewer children, but in learning to use our resources more efficiently. Obviously humans have a large impact on the environment, but to say that there should be fewer humans for the sake of the environment is ludicrous. If you are interested in learning about how human population is on a decline, take a look at the film "Demographic Winter," put together by SRB Documentary, LLC. It details the current decline of human fertility from a purely observational standpoint. I think that you should evaluate the entire issue when talking about contraception, the effects it has directly on the environment and the effects that it has on humanity as a whole.
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Email (For verification & Replies)
Code   
ChronoComments by Joomla Professional Solutions
Submit Comment
Cancel
avatar Irritated Miner
0
 
 
Good journalism requires doing more than regurgitating press releases or speeches. Things like fact checking matter. For example, the author could have gone to the Mayo Clinic website, which lists things like your sex, family history, age, weight, and use of alcohol as causes for breast cancer. NOT the use of the hormonal contraceptive pill.

Or they could have spoken to any of a dozen organizations dedicated to family planning and mentioned the existence and effectiveness of nonhormonal methods of contraception, such as the condom, femidom, or IUD. Or if those were too hard, looked up "Endocrine disruptors" on Wikipedia for other potential causes for the notorious feminized fish.

The Catholic church has a declared interest in reducing the use of contraception. But they are not the only sources of knowledge out there, and a newspaper should do better than to simply repeat their statements. Badly done, Oredigger.
B
i
u
Quote
Code
List
List item
URL
Name *
Email (For verification & Replies)
Code   
ChronoComments by Joomla Professional Solutions
Submit Comment
Cancel
Show/Hide Comment form